A Degree Delayed: Student Alleges OAU Targeted Him for Speaking Up During Minister’s Visit

A final-year OAU student claims the university removed his name from the graduation list as retaliation for peacefully protesting during Minister Wike’s campus visit.

A final-year student of Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU) has made a strong and emotional allegation, claiming that the university administration intentionally removed his name from the graduation list as retaliation for his involvement in a protest staged during the visit of Federal Capital Territory Minister, Nyesom Wike. According to the student, this action was not accidental, nor was it based on any academic deficiency, but a targeted move meant to punish him for voicing concerns and participating in what he describes as a peaceful demonstration.

He asserts that the protest was organized by students who felt compelled to speak out on issues relating to governance, living conditions on campus, accountability, and the general welfare of young people in the country. The student maintains that he joined the protest not to create chaos, but to contribute to what he believed was a legitimate call for dialogue and reform. He claims that his willingness to stand at the forefront of the demonstration made him a visible figure, which, in his view, eventually led to him being singled out.

The student insists that his academic records are fully intact, with no outstanding courses, disciplinary warnings, or academic penalties that would ordinarily disqualify him from graduating. He states that the sudden disappearance of his name from the list came as a shock, describing it as a deeply distressing experience that left him feeling victimized and unjustly targeted. To him, the decision reflects a broader pattern in which institutions attempt to suppress activism by making examples out of outspoken students.

He also expresses concern about what this situation means for the future of student participation in national conversations. According to him, if students are punished for expressing themselves, it may discourage others from speaking up on issues that affect them directly. The growing online reactions to his claims show that many individuals are engaging in discussions about campus rights, the role of student activism in democratic societies, and the responsibilities of university authorities when handling dissent.

Many people commenting on the situation have emphasized the importance of allowing students the freedom to express their opinions without fear of academic repercussions. Others have highlighted the need for transparent processes within universities, especially when decisions affect a student’s future, graduation prospects, or professional opportunities. The incident continues to generate debate, with students, alumni, and observers calling for clarity, fairness, and openness in addressing such disputes.

READ ALSO: Sexual assault: OAU dismisses English lecturer Mosobolaje

SOURCES: ALLSCHOOL, SAHARA REPORTERS