“If You’re Under 21, You’re an Infant Under the Law” — Nigerian Law Student Sparks Online Debate

A Nigerian law student sparked online controversy after explaining in a viral video that people under 21 are considered “infants” under the law and may not be fully bound by contracts, except for necessities.

A Nigerian law student has stirred massive online debate after posting a video explaining how the law treats people under the age of 21.

In the viral clip, shared on X by AskyGRN, the student—identified as Barrister Amida—breaks down aspects of contract law in a humorous but controversial way. She argued that many young Nigerians are unaware of their legal rights, especially when it comes to contracts.

According to her explanation, anyone below 21 is regarded as an “infant” under the law and may not be fully bound by contractual agreements. She noted that such individuals are generally not legally liable for contracts they enter into, except in cases involving necessities like food, shelter, or basic needs—and even then, liability may be limited.

Using playful examples, she claimed that while a person under 21 is expected to pay for necessities, the law may not compel full payment beyond what is reasonable. She went further to suggest that loans taken by people under 21 may not be legally enforceable, insisting that lenders cannot successfully sue them for repayment because they lack full contractual capacity.

Although she repeatedly warned viewers not to put themselves in danger or claim her advice if trouble arises, her comments sparked mixed reactions online, with many finding the explanation entertaining while others criticized it as misleading and potentially encouraging irresponsible behavior.

The video has since continued to circulate widely, reigniting conversations about legal awareness, age, and contractual responsibility in Nigeria.

WATCH HERE: 👉 https://x.com/esuayi/status/2023748441701073353

READ ALSO: LASU Law Student Wins Top Prize at National Competition

SOURCES: ALLSCHOOL, GISTREEL