2026 POST-UTME EXAM: One of the most painful things is passing JAMB but still missing admission because of Post-UTME. Don’t let poor preparation cost you your admission this year. Join the ALLSCHOOL POST-UTME Online Lesson and prepare the right way to beat your school’s departmental cut-off mark!
ENROLL NOW

Sharp Sharp: Gain DIRECT ENTRY Admission into any Nigerian University to STUDY ANY COURSE of your choice. NO JAMB | LOW FEES. Registration is in Progress. Interested? WhatsApp / Call: 0706 664 6818 or CLICK HERE

Gain Sure Admission into Mass Com, Computer Sci & Business Admin via Master Builder Institute. Cut-Off Mark: 100.
APPLY NOW

Strike: ASUU’s Lawyer Fires Back At FG, Says ASUU isn’t Disobeying Court Order

CURSORY: The legal counsel of the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) has responded to FG’s warning stating that the union is not in contempt of court stating that the union is taking all its actions in the due process of the law.

HUMAN rights lawyer, Mr. Femi Falana, (SAN), yesterday, has condemned the claim by the Minister of Labour and Productivity, Dr. Chris Ngige, that the Academic Staff Union of Universities, ASUU, disobeyed the order of the National Industrial Court of Nigeria, NICN, Abuja, by not asking its members to resume duties after the court’s recent ruling in the matter between the union and the Federal Government.

Recall that the federal government issued a strong warning to ASUU for not heeding the order of the court by calling off its ongoing strike.

Minister of Labour and Employment, Senator Chris Ngige, gave the warning in a statement signed over the weekend by the ministry’s Deputy Director, Press and Public Relations, Olajide Oshundun.

In a statement, Falana noted that the minister got it wrong as far as the issue is concerned.

The statement reads:

“We wish to point out to the minister that ASUU is a law-abiding organisation whose activities are conducted within the ambit of the rule of law.

“Although the minister rushed to the National Industrial Court without referring the trade dispute between ASUU and the Federal Government to the Industrial Arbitration Panel and thereby abused the process of the court. The minister is unaware that the National Industrial Court lacks the jurisdictional competence to intervene in the resolution of a trade dispute that has not been determined by the Industrial Arbitration Panel.

“However, contrary to the claim of the minister that ASUU has not filed an appeal, the application for the leave of the Court of Appeal to appeal against the interlocutory order of injunction is deemed to be an appeal under the Rules of the Court of Appeal.

“The application is equally accompanied by a motion for stay of execution of the said order. To that extent, the members of the ASUU cannot be accused of engaging in contempt of the order of the National Industrial Court in so far as they are seeking to appeal and stay the execution of the said order.

“Trial and appellate courts have always had jurisdiction to grant a stay of execution of judgment pending appeal. The exercise of the right to apply for a stay of execution by an unsuccessful litigant pending his appeal has not been treated as disobedience to the judgment he is appealing against.”

Read Also: ASUU Strike: Sokoto State Governor orders his Varsity Lecturers to Resume Classes or Forfeit their Salaries

ALLSCHOOL TEAM

Scroll to Top